The very objective of the graphic designs on a cheerleader uniform are to identify the wearer as a cheerleader and enhance their appearance, Star said.
The closely watched case centered on whether the stripes, zigzags and chevrons that typify cheerleader uniforms can be copyrighted, as Varsity contends, or are so fundamental to the objective of the garment that they should not deserve such legal protection.
The ruling could have broad implications for the fashion industry because it gives designers "another means of protecting their ornamental designs that are affixed on useful articles like clothing", said Jeanne Gills, an intellectual property lawyer with Foley & Lardner in Chicago. A federal appeals court said Varsity's lines, zigzags and braids were conceptually separate from the uniforms' functional attributes, making the designs eligible for copyright protection.
The feature is also eligible for copyright protection if it would qualify as a protectable work - either on its own or fixed in some other tangible medium of expression - if it were imagined separately from the useful article into which it is incorporated.
Angelique Kerber survives Parmentier, continues advancing at Indian Wells
While Petkovic said their long association had her anticipating perhaps too much, Kerber said she tried to stay in the moment. But obviously I don't want things to get close. "I'm not very powerful but I have a little bit the technique and the angles".
'Star Wars' director JJ Abrams developing TV series about drag icon RuPaul
For another touch of nostalgia, here's RuPaul playing the school guidance counselor in 1995's The Brady Bunch Movie . The production company is now behind RuPaul's Drag Race and also produced a titular talk show that ran in the '90s.
Colin Kaepernick Gives Meals on Wheels $50000 Donation
On Facebook, Palin implied Kaepernick's political activism is the reason he's still a free agent . Meals on Wheels faces a sharp funding cut under Trump's proposed budget.
Having stated the separability test, the Court found its application to the cheerleader uniform designs "straightforward": The surface decorations on the uniforms are identifiable as having "pictorial, graphic, or sculptural qualities", and the arrangements would qualify as two-dimensional works of art if separated from the uniform and applied in another medium.
In this case, Varsity argued the graphic elements of its cheerleader uniforms were separate from the function of the uniforms themselves, which can't be copyrighted.
Finally, the majority rejected three arguments raised by the petitioner.
Justice Ginsburg concurred with the majority, but would have found the designs to be copyrightable pictorial or graphics works that happened to be reproduced on useful articles - negating the need to parse the language of 17 U.S.C. § 101. A challenging aspect of the decision will be the "work of art" requirement.